Are you by any chance using Safari on a Mac? Safari gives me a phishing warning followed by an Apache-ID login prompt when I click "No" in the first dialog. Firefox and Chrome both proceed with an anonymous login.
-- Bjorn Danielsson Cuspy Code AB James Green <[email protected]> wrote: > Am being asked for my Apache ID. I'm listed on > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas but I doubt my > full name is what is being asked for... > > James > > > On 3 March 2013 15:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Fully agree. >> The documentation must be updated. >> >> Do you have any idea? >> Or would you propose changes? >> >> It's really easy, just use the blue pen icon on top-right of any page. You >> can choose to edit anonymously and propose a modification. >> Then, we just have to accept the update so that it's a huge contribution to >> the project. >> >> Thanks, >> Jean-Louis >> >> >> 2013/3/3 James Green <[email protected]> >> >> > Jean-Louis, >> > >> > I appreciate the advice. I think the documentation might be considered a >> > little bare when it comes to problems in this regard. >> > >> > As TomEE becomes more popular (and it will), there will be people who >> > simply won't know where TomEE ends and a sub-project begins. The greater >> > the understanding gained from the main documentation page, the less time >> > will be wasted by all. >> > >> > James >> > >> > >> > >> > On 3 March 2013 14:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > James, >> > > >> > > Maybe the best is to push a mail here and we can determine if it's >> TomEE >> > > fault or not. >> > > Otherwise, you have to go through all apache project mailing lists and >> > > either post, or check if that is a referenced bug or not. >> > > >> > > JLouis >> > > >> > > >> > > 2013/3/3 James Green <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > This I must be getting confused. >> > > > >> > > > On the home page for the project TomEE is composed as a distribution >> of >> > > > tomcat plus other apache projects such as CXF. >> > > > >> > > > When I see a bug such as this, I read the above and naturally assume >> > that >> > > > the fault lay with CXF. After all, that's where responsibility for >> web >> > > > services lay. >> > > > >> > > > So how come the bug is listed as TomEE's fault? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > >> > > > James >> > > > >> > > > Sent from my iPad >> > > > >> > > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Guess you spoke about >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-690 >> > > > > >> > > > > Please take care to not merge any jaxrs fix done since this one (or >> > > 1.5.2 >> > > > > will not be a fixes release) >> > > > > Le 2 mars 2013 20:12, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a >> > > écrit >> > > > : >> > > > > >> > > > >> Romain, if you can post the JIRA number that'd be great. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> -David >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> Hmm, providers were working in last release. The deployment is >> > > > different >> > > > >>> between both release (so the conf too a bit) but it will not be >> > > merged >> > > > >>> because too different. >> > > > >>> Le 2 mars 2013 10:16, "James Green" <[email protected]> a >> > > > écrit : >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>>> David, >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> Thanks for this. Could someone kindly establish which Jira >> relates >> > > to >> > > > >>>> JAX-RS providers not being picked up, this is in 1.6 but am not >> > sure >> > > > if >> > > > >> it >> > > > >>>> is a bug fix candidate for 1.5 or a new feature for 1.6. Given >> it >> > is >> > > > in >> > > > >> the >> > > > >>>> official spec I might hope for the former... >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> James >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> Sent from my iPad >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> On 2 Mar 2013, at 05:27, David Blevins <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>>> Based on the feedback we got we've created a 1.5.2 branch based >> > on >> > > > the >> > > > >>>> code from approximately Sat Jan 19. >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> This includes the following JIRAs that were requested: >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-669 >> > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-668 >> > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-699 >> > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-703 >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> This does not yet include this requested JIRA: >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> We will definitely add that. >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> For those that are planing to use the 1.5.2 rather than the >> 1.6.0 >> > > > with >> > > > >>>> the various system rewrites for performance, can you please try >> > the >> > > > >> 1.5.2 >> > > > >>>> snapshots and report if anything you need ismissing. >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> Builds available here: >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> - http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> If possible, get your feedback in by Friday and we can start >> > > rolling >> > > > >>>> potential release candidates. >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> -David >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jean-Louis >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis >>
