Jaxrs and jaxws are for sure but for jaxws you need to map them in web.xml
Le 5 mars 2013 22:56, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> The only producers I have our POJO Factories for my Mongo DAOs. They all
> @Inject an @ApplicationScoped datasource which itself holds the Mongo
> client connection.
>
> So web-tier.war depending-on service-tier.jar depending-on
> persistence-tier.jar each with beans.xml.
>
> Should I expect JAX-RS and JAX-WS web tier POJOs to be scanned for without
> being EJB annotated? I ask as I'm pretty sure Glassfish does "notice" them
> - what I don't recall is whether any CDI scope such as @RequestScoped is
> needed.
>
> James
>
>
>
> On 5 March 2013 21:23, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes a jar without a beans.xml is not a cdi one. About webservices maybe
> you
> > hit the fact a pojo one (not ejb) should be defined in web.xml. finally
> you
> > are right about pooling (but a lot of mongo stuff is thread safe.
> Producers
> > with scopes (reauest?) can be another answer
> > Le 5 mars 2013 22:13, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > I only added @Stateless to my @WebService classes because of deployment
> > > errors in TomEE. They worked fine in Glassfish. Figured perhaps CDI
> > wasn't
> > > as mature in TomEE?
> > >
> > > Didn't realise beans.xml had to go into each jar. Will add.
> > >
> > > If I'm reading this right, POJOs @Injected into a SLSB will share the
> > scope
> > > of the SLSB. So if the EJB container pools the SLSBs (my web tier), it
> > will
> > > also pool the POJOs? I'm balancing the need for thread safety with new
> > > instances everywhere, and memory churn with GC pauses.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 March 2013 20:45, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > It works, ensure you have a beans.xml in each jar + about annotations
> > > check
> > > > your need but @applicationscoped is tempting.
> > > >
> > > > Finally sharing your exception can help too
> > > > Le 5 mars 2013 21:39, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > I've spent the past year developing a Java EE 6 application with
> > JAX-RS
> > > > and
> > > > > JAX-WS endpoints. Each of these are annotated @Stateless.
> > > > >
> > > > > The project exists currently as a single maven project of war
> > packaging
> > > > > type. I would like to split this up by tier - web, service,
> database
> > -
> > > > as I
> > > > > suspect many other people do things this way to spread workload
> > between
> > > > > staff.
> > > > >
> > > > > My "service" layer is currently a set of POJOs. They are @Injected
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > web service layer. Similarly, the database layer is @Injected into
> > the
> > > > > service layer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Two questions emerge and I'd like some experienced voices on the
> > > matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Should I be able to push the service and database classes down
> > into
> > > a
> > > > > separate jar file, and have the existing war project depend on
> that?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Should the service and database (DAO) layers have any container
> > > > > annotations?
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a bit of a loaded question since I tried to push down the
> > > service
> > > > > and database tiers of one of my java packages but it blew up during
> > > > > deployment with the likes of
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/enterprise/inject/IllegalProductException.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Bear in mind that our database is MongoDB, so I have no need for
> EJBs
> > > for
> > > > > transaction and I'm not using EJB for security either, hence beyond
> > the
> > > > web
> > > > > tier everything is CDI.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your time in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > James
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to