both are necessary since years since the jpa provider can use both (for action not in a JTA context for instance). OpenJPA needs it for instance.
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/4/4 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:36 AM, mauro2java2011 <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I have also to declare always the resource for non jta datasource with > jta > > false ? > > Whi into petsistece.xml ir is necessary to specify bot jta-datasource and > > nojtA-datasource? > > > > > From what I understand, it is no longer necessary to set 'both' jta and > non-jta datasource in persistence.xml. no longer necessary = 1.5.2 or 1.6.0 > snapshot. If you're using 1.5.1, then it 'may' be necessary, but I don't > know. I don't use the 'release', I use 'snapshot'...always (since > 'snapshot' = 'latest version'). > > > > > What it is the difference from the datasource pooled getting from normal > > tomcat ? I refer to datasource fir poolig connection thar into tomcat i > > declare into context.xml and i refer it into web.xml into reference ?? > > > > > I will let Romain reply to this. I think tomee.xml is recommended, and in > my case, context.xml and web.xml is not necessary. >
