Integration test is needed to reproduce this issue, I think. Would be small 
application enough for reproducing the issue on your side? 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. April 2013 23:10
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: AW: Java EE Scheduler implementation in TomEE

Strict plan no but if you want to work on it (can be a patch or it can start 
with a unit test showing the issue) we can help/do it Le 21 avr. 2013 22:31, 
<[email protected]> a écrit :

> Just tested with trunk version and JobStoreCMT. There is one limitation:
> timers are executed after restart, but method TimerService.getTimers() 
> returns empty list, making it impossible to remove old timers. Are 
> there any plans to fix this limitation?
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. April 2013 16:31
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Java EE Scheduler implementation in TomEE
>
> It should be on trunk. There was some limitations but cant remember 
> which ones.
>
> Btw it was traced on jira
> Le 21 avr. 2013 16:11, <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > That would be great. Is this functionality already implemented in TomEE?
> >
> > Пользователь Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> писал:
> >
> >
> > Think we can persist stuff through quartz config Le 19 avr. 2013 
> > 19:19, <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a question in relation to Scheduling API in TomEE. As I 
> > > know org.apache.openejb.core.timer.DatabaseTimerStore is not 
> > > implemented yet, and it means that any task created with 
> > > TimerService and persistent=true will be not persisted over JVM restarts.
> > > Is there any plans or estimations to implement scheduled task 
> > > persistence in TomEE?
> > > We have to use plain Quartz scheduler now as workaround. Will be 
> > > Quartz API supported in future releases of TomEE? How will it be
> updated?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Dmitry Volkov.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to