Why are you going to add it when it already works?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > IIRC (didnt read it for months) but it sayd META-INF for jar and WEB-INF > for wars > > btw i'll add the meta-inf support since that's quite common: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-975 > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/6/12 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > > spec section 4.4.6 says it goes in META-INF > > > > but you are reading it fine from WEB-INF/classes/META-INF so that's not > an > > issue. Spec doesn't list WEB-INF anywhere in it. > > > > > > Issue is that I'm testing in TomEE 1.5.2, which is the released version. > > > > John > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > with: > > > > > > mvn test -Ptomee-build-managed -Dtomee.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT > > > -Dowb.version=1.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > i get the injection, then the constraint validator is not enriched but > > not > > > sure we read validation.xml in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF, probably just > in > > > WEB-INF as mentionned in the spec (i know others can do something > > > different) > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/6/12 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > @Romain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/johnament/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/modules/beanval/impl/src/test/java/org/apache/deltaspike/beanval/test/InjectedValidationTest.java > > > > > > > > When the validator here is @Inject rather than created using @Before, > > > it's > > > > not injected in the test case. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > It is supported and tested. > > > > > > > > > > What's your case? > > > > > Le 12 juin 2013 06:09, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." < > > smithh032...@gmail.com> > > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, this is a coincidence and interesting. We have been > discussing > > > > > > TomEE/CDI topics, and now you bring this up. Please click the > > > following > > > > > URL > > > > > > and read that. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/omnifaces/issues/detail?id=183 > > > > > > > > > > > > Howard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:23 PM, John D. Ament < > > > > john.d.am...@gmail.com > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In section 3.6 of the CDI spec, it indicates that the Validator > > > > > > > (javax.validation.Validator) should be a built in bean, meaning > > the > > > > > > > container should support injection of it. I was testing > > something > > > > > > locally > > > > > > > and i noticed that TomEE wasn't injecting this object. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this expected? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
