Nice to hear. Thanks Romain for quick response again! BR,
Matej 2014/1/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > components needs to get a compatible license...but an apache product > WILL implement jpa 2.1 for sure, if not openjpa I"m sure some guys > will be happy to fork it @apache and let openjpa die but I'm pretty > sure too it will not be needed and openjpa will impl it. Think it is > more a time issue ATM than anything else. The rush for EE 7 already > started even @ apache but slower than jboss/oracle since we are few to > be paid for it (are there in fact ATM?). > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2014/1/3 Matej <[email protected]>: > > Thank you everyone for answers. I am/was already sold on TomEE, I like > the > > whole concept and the community! > > > > I was just inteested in the Geronimo status. Because TomEE uses allot of > > Geronimo/IBM components(openjpa). Now that IBM seems to slowly stop > > involvement I was a little afraid how this will affect TomEE and Apache > JEE > > components in the long run. Jboss/Oracle are pushing hard with JEE7, > > already planning 8. And OpenJPA still discussing if to implement JPA 2.1, > > which is a litlle worrying. Does every component has to come from > Apache?:) > > > > BR, > > > > Matej > > > > > > 2014/1/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > > >> +1 Bjorn > >> > >> i don't have experience with openEJB 'without' TomEE+, but I downloaded > >> Geronimo (and even JBOSS) and tried to use it...when I was migrating > from > >> Glassfish to Tomcat/TomEE. As you said, TomEE was the easiest, and TomEE > >> committers allowed me to be successful with the migration from > Glassfish to > >> TomEE. > >> > >> i love tomee! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Bjorn Danielsson < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > My perception of TomEE is that it is a lot easier to configure than > >> > any other Java EE server. I guess this is a benefit from its OpenEJB > >> > roots. I have run OpenEJB alongside other Java application servers on > >> > the same VM, and I have installed TomEE on things like Raspberry Pi. > >> > Never seen anything so flexible. > >> > > >> > Happy new year to everyone :) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Bjorn Danielsson > >> > Cuspy Code AB > >> > > >> > > >> > Matej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Hello everyone and happy new year. > >> > > > >> > > In the comapny where I am working we are slowly migrating our AS > server > >> > > from GF to something different. Currently we are in a evaluation > >> process. > >> > > > >> > > What confuses us litlle with TomEE. Is the Geronimo status. > Geronimo at > >> > > first looks more EE compliant an production ready then TomEE. It's > also > >> > > based on Tomcat, and according to mailing lists I see the same > people > >> on > >> > > both projects. So I am a little confused, why was TomEE created in > the > >> > > first place. > >> > > > >> > > Will Geronimo and TomEE coexist,... Is IBM slowly abandoning > Geronimo > >> or > >> > > are they going back from their community version to Geronimo. > >> > > > >> > > I know this are political questions, but it would be nice to have > some > >> of > >> > > the information before committing to a particular AS. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, > >> > > > >> > > Matej > >> > > >> >
