Ok, I believe I have picked up your change for the "file:" checking, but it still is not solving it. Even after moving src/main/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml to src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/persistence.xml. (Though, it really shouldn't matter anyway, because Arquillian is the one passing in the src/test/resources/persistence.xml to test Archive).
https://travis-ci.org/jieryn/javaee-example/builds/26720549 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > should be fixed, not link to openjpa actually > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-06-04 0:11 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> Hi >> >> if we comment out org.apache.openejb.ClassLoaderUtil#getClosedJarFiles >> then it passes but not sure what changed. We should fix it before the >> release for sure. >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-06-03 21:55 GMT+02:00 jieryn <[email protected]>: >> >> I've recently started seeing a project failing because of unable to >>> read the persistence.xml in a non-existant JAR file. This project >>> works with 1.6.x lineage, but it breaks with the 1.7.x lineage. >>> >>> The reason is not apparent to me. This seems like a pretty huge >>> regression... >>> >>> https://github.com/jieryn/javaee-example >>> https://travis-ci.org/jieryn/javaee-example/builds/26695945 >>> >>> Check out, build with mvn clean install. Failure will be because of >>> persistence.xml location failure. >>> >>> Please note, if I run with -Dtest= listing a single test class, it >>> works as expected. So it seems there is some sort of static variable >>> somewhere which is holding a reference to a previous arquillian jar or >>> something along those lines.. >>> >>> Anyone know the problem here? This is blocking me. >>> >> >>
