Right, the idea is to get 80% of the use cases supported by default and running without anything. So yes, if nothing at all, then REQUIRED is assumed.
Not all wrong indeed ;-) -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <itsme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jean-Louis > > So an EJB (e.g. a stateless EJB) NOT annotated with @TransactionAttribute > at all will still have the container start a transaction when its methods > are called? > My understanding was that REQUIRED was the default if annotated, I might > have got it all wrong though > > > Regards > LF > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > Sorry, NOT_SUPPORTED does not throw an exception, but suspend the current > > if any. > > All detailed here > > > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/ejb/TransactionAttributeType.html > > > > JLouis > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As per the spec, the default is REQUIRED. > > > So if nothing specified on the class and on the method, the container > is > > > going to start a new transaction before executing the method. > > > > > > If you do not want this behavior, use SUPPORTS (if one already started > > use > > > it, otherwise, do nothing) or NOT_SUPPORTED (if one started, > execption). > > > > > > JLouis > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Lars-Fredrik Smedberg < > > itsme...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> Just a small question on EJBs and transactions. I assume that there > are > > no > > >> implicit transactions started when calling a business method on an EJB > > >> that > > >> does not have the @TransactionAttribute annotation? (Assume of course > > that > > >> there are no other ongoing transaction) > > >> > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> LF > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > >> > > >> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > >> > > >> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > > >> The information contained in this electronic message and any > > >> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > > >> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > > >> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik > Smedberg > > >> immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this > > >> message and any attachments. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments. >
