Le 7 août 2015 08:04, "Steve Goldsmith" <sgj...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Since CDI beans do not support final methods could I make filter final by
> using @Vetoed?
>

Yes but cdi does support it if the bean is dependent ;)

> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
>
> wrote:
>
> > just curiosity: remove @Singleton and making the class @Vetoed should
> > ensure it is not a CDI bean or an EJB so it would be a bit faster for
this
> > particular impl.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-08-07 7:48 GMT-07:00 sgjava <sgj...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > This is what I ended up with:
> > >
> > > @Singleton
> > > @Provider
> > > public class ServerResponseLoggingFilter implements
> > ContainerResponseFilter
> > > {
> > >
> > >     /**
> > >      * Logger.
> > >      */
> > >     //CHECKSTYLE:OFF ConstantName
> > >     private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.
> > >             getLogger(ServerResponseLoggingFilter.class);
> > >     //CHECKSTYLE:ON ConstantName
> > >
> > >    @Override
> > >     public void filter(final ContainerRequestContext requestContext,
> > >             final ContainerResponseContext responseContext) {
> > >         log.debug(String.format("Entity: %s",
> > > responseContext.getEntity()));
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ContainerResponseFilter-for-logging-tp4675772p4675778.html
> > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Steven P. Goldsmith

Reply via email to