👌👍 On Jun 16, 2016 13:23, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep think so. Until we are foced to support it i dont see any valid reason > to fail for this case - which is valid user point of view. > > Only pitfall I see is conflicting annotations but defaults should be fine. > Le 16 juin 2016 13:08, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <itsme...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > Thanks for the reply Romain ... out of curiosity does Tomee allow it? > > > > Regards > > LF > > On Jun 16, 2016 13:02, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > You read it right but spec also states this an be removed in fiture > > > releases. > > > > > > Not sure why it has been done this way to be honest > > > Le 16 juin 2016 12:34, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <itsme...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Some parts of this is WELD specific and I know Tomee uses OWB but > other > > > > parts are questions more to whats in the specs.... > > > > > > > > In the EJB 3.2 spec in section 7.1 I can read > > > > > > > > "It is illegal to associate JTA transactional interceptors (see [8]) > > with > > > > Enterprise JavaBeans. The EJB > > > > Container should fail deployment of such applications.[39]" > > > > > > > > And when starting the my container (I have tried it in WLP) I get an > > > error > > > > when trying to use @Transactional on a @MessageDriven bean which > seems > > > okay > > > > according to the EJB spec. > > > > > > > > However when reading the WELD reference section 15.4 ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html_single/#_calling_a_bean_from_a_message_driven_bean > > > > ) > > > > I see the following example: > > > > > > > > @Transactional @MessageDriven > > > > public class ProcessOrder implements MessageListener { > > > > @Inject Inventory inventory; > > > > @PersistenceContext EntityManager em; > > > > > > > > public void onMessage(Message message) { > > > > ... > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > The text however does not mention the @Transactional interceptor > > > > specifically but rather state that: > > > > > > > > "You can even use interceptor bindings for message-driven Beans." > > > > > > > > *Question:* > > > > > > > > - Is the example using @Transactional not a good example since this > is > > > not > > > > permitted according to the EJB spec or is MDBs a special case where > it > > > > should be permitted? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Lars-Fredrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > > > > > > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > > > > > > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any > > > > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > > > > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. > If > > > > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik > Smedberg > > > > immediately at itsme...@gmail.com, and destroy all copies of this > > > > message and any attachments. > > > > > > > > > >
