Hi, I got exactly the same problem when deploying an app without beans.xml. However, I tried to deploy it on Tomcat + OpenWebBeans + Mojarra and it worked fine. What do you think?
Regards, Lazar On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > feel free to edit the website to add that where you think it fits (with the > small blue pen button) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-08-05 18:24 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > > > Totally agree on the fail. So, the good word here is that PLUME works, > one > > simply needs to supply a beans.xml file. Anyway this can be documented > very > > clearly somewhere? I mean, luckily, PLUS and Web Profile, which is > probably > > the majority of downloads, adhere to the "optional" beans.xml and still > run > > in CDI 1.2 (am I right?). But since PLUME has this "deficiency", I think > > it's probably worth noting somewhere. Maybe in the release notes? Or > maybe > > even on the downloads page? Somewhere where it's unmistakable that the > > developer needs to explicitly create beans.xml or an exception will > occur. > > > > What's your take on that? > > > > Kay > > > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > beans.xml "is" optional (strictly speaking cause if you check what it > > does > > > when not there you probably want to add it back) > > > > > > issue is OwbAppfactory expects CDI to be there, if there is no CDI need > > > then i suspect it is skipped and mojarra integration behaves > differently > > > than myfaces one - failing :D. > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > > rmannibucau> | > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > > > 2016-08-05 18:15 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> I have added both 7.0.1 PLUS and Web Profile to my NetBeans > > installation. > > >> I can take the same project, switch it to PLUS or Web Profile and > deploy > > >> the simple web app successfully. NetBeans does NOT generate a > beans.xml > > >> file anymore since that has been made optional in JSF 2.2 (I believe). > > >> > > >> In order to test your concern, I have added a beans.xml file and now > the > > >> project deploys successfully! So, again, I thought the beans.xml file > is > > >> optional. Look at Weld 2.2 which is the CDI 1.2 reference > implementation > > >> and scroll down where it says that beans.xml is now optional: > > >> http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/04/15/weld-220-final/ > > >> > > >> Thoughts? > > >> > > >> Kay > > >> > > >>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> looks like CDI was completely turned off for this app, is that > > possible? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > > >> rmannibucau> | > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >>> > > >>> 2016-08-05 17:54 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi Romain. It's linked (see the pastebin link?). > > >>>> > > >>>> Kay > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > >>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hello Kay, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> do you have the full stack? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > > >>>> rmannibucau> | > > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2016-08-05 17:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Dear TomEE Team, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> First of all, congrats on releasing Apache TomEE 7. I've > downloaded > > >>>> TomEE > > >>>>>> 7.0.1 PLUME in order to test-drive it, and I am running into the > > >>>> following > > >>>>>> exception when I'm trying to deploy a first simple > > NetBeans-generated > > >>>> Web > > >>>>>> Application (it's the most basic application you can create): > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 05-Aug-2016 10:18:08.326 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-10] > > >>>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart Exception > > >>>> sending > > >>>>>> context initialized event to listener instance of class > > >>>>>> com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener > > >>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: com.sun.faces.config. > > >>>> ConfigurationException: > > >>>>>> Factory 'javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindowFactory' was not > > >> configured > > >>>>>> properly. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Click here for a full stack trace: http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0 < > > >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I am running this from within a VirtualBox VM running Debian 8 > with > > >>>>>> backports enabled for OpenJDK 8 and NetBeans 8.1 Patch 1. TomEE is > > >>>>>> installed in user's home directory to avoid permissions problems. > > The > > >>>> web > > >>>>>> application has PrimeFaces 5.0 as part of its library list if that > > is > > >>>>>> important. Other than that, the project is a standard JSF 2.2 / > > >> JavaEE 7 > > >>>>>> Web Application, as vanilla as it comes from NetBeans new web > > >>>> application > > >>>>>> wizard. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Please advise, and thanks. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Kay Wrobel > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
