2017-03-30 12:15 GMT+02:00 COURTAULT Francois < [email protected]>:
> Hello Romain, > > Not sure to understand. TomEE 7.0.2 is JAX-RS 2.0 as well as TomEE 7.0.3, > right ? > Yes > What do you mean by "ensure jackson was set with application/json > mediatype" ? > By default TomEE uses Johnzon since first 7.0.0 release. It sets it as the least prioritized application/json provider to let the users use something else and the usage be quite smooth and automatic. Jackson doesn't respect this JAXRS constraint (yes JAXRS 1 -> JAXRS 2 resolution got clarified...and broke even if it shouldnt have been). In 2 words jackson uses */* which means the last one to use if none are matching. Since johnzon uses application/json (and application/*+json IIRC) then it is used cause matching the request where jackson doesnt. If you wrap jackson provider in a custom one changing this @Consumes and @Produces it will work automatically. Here is the bug https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-jaxrs-json-provider/blob/master/src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/jaxrs/json/JacksonJsonProvider.java#L55 for memories > > We just use, as mentioned, Jackson annotations, we don't perform any > initialization at Jackson level in our code ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: jeudi 30 mars 2017 11:56 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [+SPAM+]: Re: No issue with 7.0.2 but issue with 7.0.3 using > @JsonProperty coming from jackson > > Hi > > did you ensure jackson was set with application/json mediatype and not its > default */* which means "least prioritized" since JAXRS 2.0? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog < > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog < > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory < > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-03-30 11:54 GMT+02:00 COURTAULT Francois < > [email protected]>: > > > Hello, > > > > We have a rest Api which uses POJO classes with Bean Validation > > annotations (like @Pattern, @NotNull) and Jackson annotations like > > @JsonProperty. > > Previously, using TomEE 7.0.2, we have no issue using the > > @JsonProperty Jackson annotation. Indeed, this kind of annotations was > taken into account. > > > > But when we migrate to 7.0.3, it seems that the @JsonProperty Jackson > > annotation is not anymore taking into account ☹ Is there any way to > > fix that ? > > > > Best Regards. > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized > > use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the > sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > > damages caused by a transmitted virus. > > > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. >
