Romain, My interceptor is linked to an annotation and is declared in the beans.xml in order to work so I guess it is a cdi interceptor and, according to what you have said, a new proxy is created and so the injection is not done on the right proxy, right ? But, in this case, is it a bug ?
The other solution is to use @Interceptor or @Interceptors annotations but we lose the beauty of using an annotation for interceptor, right ? Best Regards. -----Original Message----- From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 15:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null annotation = cdi interceptor? if so it leads to a proxy and the injection happens on the wrong instance I think Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-23 15:50 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <[email protected]>: > Hello Romain, > > I think I have found the issue. > In fact, we used a custom annotation for a logging interceptor which targets > METHOD and TYPE. > > If we remove this annotation on our WS endpoint (eg TYPE target) , then the > injection is resolved. > > Do you know why we have this side effect ? Is it a bug ? > I have a test case if you want. > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 14:25 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null > > Looks close to > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/server/openejb-cxf/src/tes > t/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/PojoWebServiceContextTest.java > , what can be the difference? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-23 13:49 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois > <[email protected]>: >> Hello, >> >> No it's not an EJB webservice, just a POJO webservice annotated with >> @WebService(name = "MyManager", targetNamespace = >> "http://xxx.yyy.test..com/";, serviceName = "MyManager", wsdlLocation = >> "wsdl/MyManager.wsdl") like in the sample of my first email. >> It looks quite similar to the sample provided in the JAX-WS 2.3 >> specification (maintenance release 5), page 82, §5.3 >> (javax.xml.ws.WebServiceContext) except that the annotation, in our >> development, uses attributes like name, ... >> >> Best Regards. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 13:34 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null >> >> Hi François, >> >> did you test with an EJB webservice? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >> >> >> 2017-11-23 12:11 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois >> <[email protected]>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have the following : >>> >>> @WebService(name = "MyManager", targetNamespace = >>> "http://xxx.yyy.test..com/";, serviceName = "MyManager", wsdlLocation >>> = >>> "wsdl/MyManager.wsdl") public class MyManagerService implements >>> MyManager { >>> >>> @Resource >>> WebServiceContext webServiceContext; .... >>> } >>> >>> And the webServiceContet is always null ! Any clue ? >>> >>> Best Regards. >>> ________________________________ >>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and >>> may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, >>> either whole or partial, is prohibited. >>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for >>> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended >>> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >>> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >>> transmitted virus. >> ________________________________ >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and >> may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, >> either whole or partial, is prohibited. >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for >> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended >> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >> transmitted virus. > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and > may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, > either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free > from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
