That actually answered my question, I didn't have a proper stateless pool
config in my tomee.xml... I assumed everything would be configured under
<Resource> so I was putting the maxSize property there, hence the property
not working. I added a <Container> and put the prop there instead. Things
are working as expected now. Thanks!

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:02 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
[email protected]> wrote:

> At first glance, it looks like your threads are actually stuck trying to
> borrow a database connection from the pool. What does your stateless pool
> config and your datasource config look like (remove anything sensitive,
> like passwords etc)?
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:13 PM Kean Erickson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Sure, thread dump is attached. I had to censor out references to my code,
> > but calls in the Stateless class in question are marked with three
> > exclamations, "!!!"
> >
> > After a few minutes, this happens for every call  to a method in that
> > @Stateless class, which is acquired and used in non-EJB classes via
> > BeanManager.getReference
> >
> >
> > 10-Oct-2018 10:35:50.749 SEVERE [pool-17-thread-9]
> > javax.ejb.ConcurrentAccessTimeoutException: No instances available in
> > Stateless Session Bean pool.  Waited 30 SECONDS
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.stateless.StatelessInstanceManager.getInstance(StatelessInstanceManager.java:226)
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.stateless.StatelessContainer.invoke(StatelessContainer.java:204)
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbObjectProxyHandler.synchronizedBusinessMethod(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:265)
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbObjectProxyHandler.businessMethod(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:260)
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.EjbObjectProxyHandler._invoke(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:89)
> >     at
> >
> org.apache.openejb.core.ivm.BaseEjbProxyHandler.invoke(BaseEjbProxyHandler.java:347)
> >     at (method in stateless class)
> >     at (method in non-EJB class)
> >     at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> >     at
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> >     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:45 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Can you get a thread dump when you're seeing this issue?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to