Hi Josef,

I don't know how to do it on your behalf.
But you can do it yourself by sending an email to
users-unsubscr...@tomee.apache.org

Hope it helps
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:28 PM Josef Puff <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please remove me from the mailing list.
>
> thx
>
> > Am 25.02.2019 um 15:28 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > Yes that correct.
> > You need to plugin that producer and the producer is the one that can
> > leverage mp-config and the same property names.
> >
> > This way, when switching to next TomEE, you only need to yank that
> producer
> > and it should work out of the box.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:18 AM COURTAULT Francois <
> > francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Jean-Louis,
> >>
> >> I have looked at the samples code.
> >> As I am using TomEE 7.1.0 (MP JWT 1.0 compliant), I guess I can't use
> the
> >> mp.jwt.verify.publickey or mp.jwt.verify.publickey.location and
> >> mp.jwt.verify.issuer config properties, right  ?
> >>
> >> Instead, I have to write a XXXMPJWTConfigurationProvider class in order
> to
> >> generate a context info having the public key to  check the JWT
> signature,
> >> right ?
> >>
> >> Best Regards.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro [mailto:jlmonte...@tomitribe.com]
> >> Sent: samedi 23 février 2019 11:22
> >> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Try to build a JWT sample
> >>
> >> Bonjour François,
> >>
> >> Is there a way for you to share the project?
> >> I worked on the JWT implementation and the example, I might be able to
> >> help.
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>
> >>
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fjlouismonteiro&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata=ovFBgowFCnAAMD0mMFccdi5ze2SMZPLEPnr9cRDIFqc%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tomitribe.com&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata=we33aDDG%2F2O7KR7Q3yDd7ZyRbgpnYE3p0XEz0OtbjQQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:56 PM COURTAULT Francois <
> >> francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I try to build a simple sample using TomEE MP 7.1.0 but I get an error
> >>> and I don't know what's going on or how I can fix that.
> >>> For that, I have read the microprofile-jwt-auth-spec-1.0.pdf, so in my
> >>> war application deployed:
> >>>
> >>> *         I have a public class MPJwtApplication extends Application
> >>> annotated with @LoginConfig(authMethod = "MP-JWT", realmName =
> >>> "TCK-MP-JWT")
> >>>
> >>> *         I have  a resource class  annotated @Path("resources")
> >>> @RequestScoped where I have
> >>>
> >>> o    @Inject private JsonWebToken callerPrincipal;
> >>>
> >>> o    A @GET public Response test () {
> System.out.println("JsonWebToken:"
> >> +
> >>> callerPrincipal + "."); return Response.ok().build();}
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In the war deployed, I also have a beans.xml with the following
> content:
> >>>
> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans
> >>> xmlns="
> >>
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.jcp.org%2Fxml%2Fns%2Fjavaee&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata=SguBgQ1i0q3857p347Kz5DUEBQg0rPB87HEf9RhDLfo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >> "
> >>>       xmlns:xsi="
> >>
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2FXMLSchema-instance&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata=b7SQw7g52Y8goyvKLR78uR9so5q2D%2BPZH5bAMl%2Bsh1Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >> "
> >>>
> >>> xsi:schemaLocation="https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u
> >>> rl=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.jcp.org%2Fxml%2Fns%2Fjavaee&amp;data=02%7C01%7CF
> >>> rancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C3
> >>> 7d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata
> >>> =SguBgQ1i0q3857p347Kz5DUEBQg0rPB87HEf9RhDLfo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>>
> >>
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.jcp.org%2Fxml%2Fns%2Fjavaee%2Fbeans_1_1.xsd&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C636865141334006978&amp;sdata=UAMyzrxk%2BU2%2BMxNBvKe%2FFGTkQmFj7xq%2BtJC8YFrWWuk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >> "
> >>>       bean-discovery-mode="all">
> >>>
> >>> </beans>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Using Soap UI, I send a GET HTTP request with an Authorization header:
> >>> bearer <JWT Base 64 encoded>, the error I get is:
> >>>
> >>> 22-Feb-2019 15:32:43.729 WARNING [http-nio-8080-exec-20]
> >>> org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doDefaultLogging
> >>> Application {
> >>> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjwt.
> >>> mp%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7CFrancois.COURTAULT%40gemalto.com%7Cc7d08390db
> >>> 874ae8897408d69978c5fa%7C37d0a9db7c464096bfe31add5b495d6d%7C0%7C0%7C63
> >>> 6865141334006978&amp;sdata=5gjcfEjv5a%2BqTNyXk1ztdt1pnLE5JIevOexg28%2F
> >>> cWlU%3D&amp;reserved=0}MPJwtResource has thrown exception, unwinding
> >>> now
> >>> org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: WebBeans producer : currentPrincipal
> >>> return type in the component implementation class :
> >>> org.apache.tomee.microprofile.jwt.cdi.MPJWTProducer scope type must be
> >>> @Dependent to create null instance
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I was expecting to have the callerPrincipal set to null but why this
> >>> CDI @Dependent scope error stuff ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any idea ?
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards.
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the
> >>> addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized
> >>> use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> >>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
> >>> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
> >>> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the
> >> sender.
> >>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this
> >>> transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for
> >>> damages caused by a transmitted virus.
> >>>
> >> ________________________________
> >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> >> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> >> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
> for
> >> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
> intended
> >> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> >> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> >> transmitted virus.
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to