dependency>
<groupId>commons-fileupload</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-fileupload</artifactId>
<version>1.5</version>
<scope>runtime</scope> <!-- can't find out which JAR needs it -->
TomEE comes with this one. So you should be able to use scope "provided",
or omit it.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023, 2:58 PM Milan Durovic <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suspected that myself and that’s why I wrote a small script that checked
> ALL the JAR files, both those pulled in for the web app, as well as those
> in the Tomee installation directory, for
> jakarta.faces.context.ExternalContext class definition. The result was, as
> I mentioned in the original post, that I could find only one JAR,
> myfaces-api-3.0.2.jar, as expected, to have that definition.
>
> The full list of dependencies in my POM.XML file is:
>
> <dependencies>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta.servlet</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta.servlet-api</artifactId>
> <version>5.0.0</version>
> <scope>provided</scope> <!-- comes with Tomcat -->
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakartaee-api</artifactId>
> <version>9.1.1</version>
> <scope>provided</scope> <!-- comes with Tomee -->
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>jakarta.inject</groupId>
> <artifactId>jakarta.inject-api</artifactId>
> <version>2.0.1</version>
> <scope>provided</scope> <!-- comes with Tomee -->
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId>
> <artifactId>tomcat-coyote</artifactId>
> <version>10.0.27</version>
> <scope>provided</scope> <!-- comes with Tomee -->
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
> <artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId>
> <version>3.0.2</version>
> <scope>provided</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.hibernate.orm</groupId>
> <artifactId>hibernate-core</artifactId>
> <version>6.1.7.Final</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.hibernate.orm</groupId>
> <artifactId>hibernate-c3p0</artifactId>
> <version>6.1.7.Final</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <!-- this dependency is required for ANTLR plugin to work; it
> provides runtime JARs
> for generated parsers -->
> <groupId>antlr</groupId>
> <artifactId>antlr</artifactId>
> <version>2.7.7</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>javax.mail</groupId>
> <artifactId>mail</artifactId>
> <version>1.4.7</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.directory.studio</groupId>
> <artifactId>org.apache.logging.log4j</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.17</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.postgresql</groupId>
> <artifactId>postgresql</artifactId>
> <version>42.2.22</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>commons-net</groupId>
> <artifactId>commons-net</artifactId>
> <version>3.3</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.mnode.ical4j</groupId>
> <artifactId>ical4j</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.4</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>commons-codec</groupId>
> <artifactId>commons-codec</artifactId>
> <version>1.15</version>
> <scope>provided</scope>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>commons-fileupload</groupId>
> <artifactId>commons-fileupload</artifactId>
> <version>1.5</version>
> <scope>runtime</scope> <!-- can't find out which JAR needs it -->
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.ostermiller</groupId>
> <artifactId>utils</artifactId>
> <version>1.07.00</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.primefaces</groupId>
> <artifactId>primefaces</artifactId>
> <version>11.0.0</version>
> <classifier>jakarta</classifier>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.primefaces.themes</groupId>
> <artifactId>cupertino</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.8</version>
> </dependency>
> </dependencies>
>
> I can provide the full list of all JARs, if that would help. The thing
> that confuses me that the error message doesn’t clearly say that there’s a
> duplicate definition of the jakarta.faces.context.ExternalContext class. If
> that was the case, one would reasonably expect that the loader would
> include the names of JARs where these duplicate definitions are found. I’m
> also not sure if one loader already found the required class, why would web
> app initialisation code go with another loader to try the same class? Maybe
> I’m speculating too far :-)
>
> > On 24 Jul 2023, at 11:55 pm, Jonathan S. Fisher <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Provided is definitely the correct scope, are you pulling in any other
> > "spec" jars by chance into your maven build?
> >
>
>
