I have started the Fedora package review in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463

it is still v2.x now, I will update it to v3.0.0 asap.

FYI

在 2011-06-14二的 16:16 -0700,Billy Vierra写道:
> I currently am :) there are a few things holding us back right now. 
> Unfortunately I started a new job and the transition has taken more of my ATS 
> time. I am actually about to post the RPM I have for it.
> 
> Here are the errors from rpmlint currently:
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libtsutil.so.3.0.0 
> _exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding 
> /usr/share/doc/trafficserver-3.0.0/README-EC2
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
> /usr/lib64/libtsutil.so
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
> /usr/lib64/libtsmgmt.so
> trafficserver.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun 
> /usr/lib64/libtsmgmt.so.3.0.0
> trafficserver.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun 
> /usr/lib64/libtsutil.so.3.0.0
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir 
> /etc/trafficserver/body_factory/default/.body_factory_info
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc 
> /etc/trafficserver/trafficserver-release
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/trafficserver
> trafficserver.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/trafficserver
> trafficserver.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/init.d/trafficserver
> trafficserver.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/trafficserver
> 
> Some of them I can do pretty easy (the logrotate, conf, etc). However I 
> talked with Zwoop a little bit about the others, just need to get them into 
> Jira.
> -B
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan-Frode Myklebust" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:49:17 PM
> Subject: packaged for RHEL / EPEL ?
> 
> Are anybody looking into getting ATS packaged for RHEL / EPEL ? Or does
> anybody know of a good RPM spec file I can use as a base to try to get
> it included in EPEL ?
> 
> 
>   -jf


Reply via email to