Good idea, I'm on board. I know I'd have a tough time getting approval on a version with "unstable" in the name :).
"dev" says everything that needs to be said while causing less uneasiness. Cheers! Tim -----Original Message----- From: Luca Rea [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:43 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: R: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle I think many users look at dev release just like to a fixed and working fine release under development for adding more great features to be tested, not an unstable one with declared bugs. Luca Rea Reparto IT System engineer __________________________________ ContactLab s.r.l. Via Natale Battaglia 12 20127 Milano Tel. +39.02.283118.1 Fax. +39.02.70030269 http://www.contactlab.com __________________________________ E-mail & E-marketing Evolution ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:[email protected]] Inviato: Friday, June 08, 2012 09:29 PM A: [email protected] <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Oggetto: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle I'd like to suggest that starting with v3.3.0, we make our development releases named e.g. trafficserver-3.3.0-dev Any objections? The reason is that "unstable" has bad connotation in the communities in general, and corporations in particular. And we really want people to have the guts to try our dev releases, even though they can sometimes be a bit risky. -- Leif
