Am 08.03.2013 08:51, schrieb Igor Galić: >> SNI seems to work very well, and for those people that insist on >> using >> IE and XP, they will just have to go on without SSL.. > > Those who insist on XP+IE probably don't really care about SSL > or the security it provides anyway ;)
as user you are not in the position to care in most cases fact is if you are hosting a website and redirect to https:// you will lock out any user which have not the chice and most of these are business users > But that reminds me: There are still a number of low level APIs > and libraries that do not support SNI: Off the top of my head > JDK6 comes to my mind... and that is why you can SNI only use for your pet's website but nut if you hosting anything which is business relevant
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
