Sounds like a plan to me. It does look like there's quite a few tickets open against v6.0. :(
Regards, Adam On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:24 AM Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > seeing we’re having issues getting v6.0.0 ready and stable for a release > candidate, I’d like to propose the following changes to the 6.x release > process: > > 1) v6.0.0 gets pushed out to September 15, 2016. This does *not* mean you > should ignore the issues holding up the 6.0.0, on the contrary. Please, it > is everyones responsibility to help making these releases, not just the RM. > > 2) v6.1.0 is scheduled for January 15, 2016, and v6.2.0 for April 15 2016. > > 3) There is no v6.3.0 release, instead v6.2.0 is the LTS for the 6.x cycle. > > 4) v7.0.0 stays scheduled for a July 2016 release for now, but we might > revisit that after the outcome of the v6.x releases. > > > On a personal note, I’m a little disappointed that we’ve let the current > RM down, and have not been helping him getting the release for v6.0.0 ready > for production use in a timely manner. Being RM is an arduous task, > everyone, please make an effort of lessen the burden on our RMs by focusing > development efforts on the upcoming release(s). > > Thanks, > > — Leif > >
