Hey Steve, Can you share some details on config or performance turning or results ?
Thanks, Di Li > On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Lerner, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve benchmarked ATS forward proxy post with cache disabled to near 10gbps on > an Openstack VM with a 10Gbps NIC. > I used Apache Bench for this. > > Steve Lerner | Director / Architect - Performance Engineering | m > 212.495.9212 | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <image001.png> > > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Di Li <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 12:32 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: benchmark ATS > > using 6.2.0, repeatable > > > Thanks, > Di Li > > > > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Am 13.12.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Di Li: > > When I doing some benchmark for outbound proxy, and has http_cache > enabled, well, first of all, the performance are pretty low, I guess I > didn’t do it right with the cache enabled, 2nd when I use wrk to have > 512 connection with 40 thread to go through proxy with http, it cause a > core dump, here’s the trace > > And when I disable the http.cache, the performance has went up a lot, > and no more coredump at all. > > > FATAL: CacheRead.cc <http://cacheread.cc/> <http://cacheread.cc > <http://cacheread.cc/>>:249: failed assert > `w->alternate.valid()` > traffic_server: using root directory '/ngs/app/oproxy/trafficserver' > traffic_server: Aborted (Signal sent by tkill() 20136 1001) > traffic_server - STACK TRACE > > is this repeatable? > which version of ATS? > > at least mention the software version should be common-sense > > had one such crash after upgrade to 7.0.0 and was not able to reproduce it, > even not with a "ab -k -n 10000000 -c 500" benchmark >
