+1 From: Veiko Kukk <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 4:03 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Replace LuaJIT configurations with YAML
+1 from me too. It would be nice to have modern, easily parsable (for whatever automation) configuration file syntax. Veiko 2018-05-08 11:01 GMT+03:00 Bryan Call <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: +1 -Bryan > On May 7, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like to propose that we eliminate the existing LuaJIT configurations with > a simple YAML format. This would be the first step towards a unified > configuration format, and I think we have to admit defeat on Lua, and do > something simpler and more normal for both developers and users. > > There are only 2 (or 3) configurations using the LuaJIT configurations: > > logging.config > sni.config > > > But, also see my other proposal of killing metrics.config, which is currently > in LuaJIT as well. > > If we agree to this, we’ll remove LuaJIT as a first class citizen from ATS > v8.0.0. For the ts-lua plugin, we’ll continue to support this (of course), > but it will require an externally provided LuaJIT distribution. We already > have the —with-luajit configure option, and we’ll expand on that to > auto-detect system level LuaJIT availability. > > If there are no strong arguments against this proposal, I’d like to get this > change done for ATS v8.0.0. > > Thanks, > > — Leif >
