Eric, On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 6:56 am Eric Chaves <[email protected] wrote:
> Nice! Thank you for answering! > > Em ter, 19 de fev de 2019 às 17:57, Jeremy Payne <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> i've configured putty to send traffic through ATS, same should work for >> FTP. >> your FTP client will just have to support using a HTTP proxy. >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:47 PM Eric Chaves <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Jeremy, thanks replying. I'm still working to have a basic version >> working on my AWS infrastructure (I'm having a hard time to work my way >> around the logs, I confess) so I wasn't able to test much yet. =) >> > >> > Your point on manually setting the proxy on the my application's is >> correct and are expected. >> > >> > Would you be able to confirm if the ATS knows how to handle the FTP >> protocol, or is it HTTP "aware" only? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Em ter, 19 de fev de 2019 às 17:32, Jeremy Payne <[email protected]> >> escreveu: >> >> >> >> CONNECT method should work here.. Have you tried that ? >> >> Of course you'll have to explicitly set a proxy at the client end. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:46 PM Eric Chaves <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi Folks, >> >> > >> >> > I'm new to traffic-server and I'd like to evaluate it to be used as >> a non-cache forward proxy between my application servers and some 3rd >> partners servers. My applications server are dynamically allocated (AWS EC2 >> auto-scaled) but my partners services require us to reach them with a >> single IP addres, hence the idea of using ATS. >> >> > >> >> > In my scenario one important feature is the ability to handle other >> protcolos other than HTTP/S like FTP/S (and not required but desired SFTP). >> >> > >> >> > I've scouted the ATS docs but didn't found any specific reference >> for those other protocols. >> >> > >> >> > If possible I would like to hear from more experienced users if ATS >> is a good choice for this use case and if can handle other protocols than >> HTTP. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks in advance for any help, >> >> > >> >> > Eric >> > Just out of curiosity, why ats? Why not something simpler, squid or socat or even iptables on an ec2 instance will do the job as tcp proxy? Is it caching the requirement? Also how good is ats in supporting dynamic backends like constantly changing ec2 instances? Is it something custom made taking care of it? >
