+1
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:07 PM Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> Accidentally (I blame Bryan …) we discovered that using this log tag can
> put some noticeable pressure on mutexes in the librecords subsystem. You’d
> use it like
>
> %<{proxy.process.version.server.build_number}record>
>
>
> Seeing that this (ab)use of librecord is not how it was intended for, if
> no one really objects, I’d like to recommend that we mark this log tag as
> “Deprecated” for 9.0.0 (it’ll still function), with a big fat warning on
> performance problems. And then for 10.0.0, we remove it.
>
> If people have use cases like the above, Randall and I would like to
> suggest that we simply implement normal log tags (which was tried before,
> and was shutdown unfortunately).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> — leif
>
> P.s
