Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which was
not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very
much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance
issues to use it. :)



Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
>> Eelco, you're right!
>> The latest profiling shows where the bottleneck is... it is indeed not
>> where
>> I was looking for.
>> I thought it was because of serialization because when using 1.2.x branch
>> i
>> found out that setSerializeSessionAttributes(false) improved a lot
>> application responsiveness.
> 
> Pfew. I (and the rest of the team) will sleep much better now ;-)
> 
> Anything you want to share what your problem was in case people can
> learn from it?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eelco
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/setSerializeSessionAttributes-in-wicket-1.3.0-beta2-tf4267003.html#a12185336
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to