On 9/10/07, JulianS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
> This is one reason that ruby on rails has taken off--the combination of
> Instant Rails and Active Record makes it the easiest framework to get a
> fully database-enabled application up and running.
> <snip>
> Julian


But the thing is, if someone would have started bitching at DHH "why do I
have to install this "gems" thing to get a Rails app working"  he would have
told them where to go. Chickabee was po'd because Wicket uses Maven for a
few things and that's not how he operates.

Because we are using a well established ecosystem such as Java (Ruby was all
greenfield when Rails came out), everyone probably does things 100 different
ways in our neck of the woods.  Unfortunately this may loose some of those
not willing to try a new (and frankly better) way.  Even though you really
only need Maven for the quick starts.  After that, download the jars
manually and Ant away...

Craig.

--
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/First-Day-Disgust%21-tf4405663.html#a12601343
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to