Well, actually, I'm not sure how this would work, as you'd have to load the children asynchronously and then update the tree. That certainly isn't a trivial thing. I guess it would be better to replace the link with an indicatingajaxlink or something like that.
-Matej On 9/21/07, swaroop belur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Initially when building the tree , just add a single child node to each > first level of nodes u show > You can mark this node as a "indicator node" or a "busy node" - this will > allow the + sign to come > up for the actual node. When u click on the + sign , representing the actual > node , just > remove the busy/ indicator node after all the actual children have been > added ...(also just check if the indicator node is the only child - this > way u will avoid another database hit for the second open click > for the same node.) > > > > > > pixotec wrote: > > > > I want to use LinkTree to represent a very very large hierarchy (the > > loading of the whole thing is expensive...). > > Is there an AJAX way of loading the children of a node just when clicking > > on the "plus-icon" for expanding? > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/LinkTree-lazy-loading-possible--tf4493231.html#a12814930 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
