Michael,

As I said I don't use the ChannelService myself, but I used to have similar
troubles with the PushService, which I think I finally fixed, but it wasn't
easy. Since the fix is in TimerChannelBehavior (which is used by both the
push and channel timer based implementation, it should work for both, but I
haven't tested. Can I ask which version of wicket and wicketstuff-push
you're using, and also which implementation of IChannelService? If you want
to investigate in the code, the core of the fix relies on the redirect and
setRedirectId in TimerChannelBehavior.

Xavier

On 10/24/07, Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> first of all thank you for the effort you've done for the push-project. Up
> to now it really provided the features I need for my app. But now I'm kind
> of stuck. My problem is: I have two panels on one page. Both panel
> subscribe
> themselves as ChannelListener for the same channel. But unfortunately
> whenever an event invoking the listeners occurred, the onEvent method gets
> executed twice on both listeners (i.e. four times). It occurrs only if you
> have two panels i.e. two listeners on the same page.
>
> IMO the error is somewhere in the javascript where a function gets
> executed
> twice...but I haven't found it so far. So do you have any clue?
>
> thanks
>
> Michael
>
> Xavier Hanin wrote:
> >
> > On 10/23/07, Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Xavier,
> >>
> >> thanks for your reply - well yes, that's certainly right. I've just
> lost
> >> sight of it. But I got another question: how stable is the
> >> wicketstuff-push
> >> project or what sections are stable and which have to be improved for
> use
> >> in
> >> a professional webapp?
> >
> >
> > AFAIK wicketstuff-push is developed by vincent demay and myself. Vincent
> > worked on the cometd channel implementation, and I've worked mostly on
> the
> > timer based IPushService implementation (where events do not come from
> the
> > client at all). I don't know how stable is the channel implementation
> > since
> > I don't use it myself, maybe Vincent could give more details (not sure
> if
> > it's used in production or not). For the IPushService implementation, it
> > still requires more testing and improvements, because the problem is not
> > easy to solve with a timer based polling implementation: we have to
> detect
> > clients disconnection, and also handle back button where pages go back
> to
> > life from the a serialized form. And we also need to work on a comet
> based
> > implementation of this push service. So I think there's still need for
> > improvement and bug fixing in this section.
> >
> > BTW, I've just checked in an improvement about this problem of page
> > deserialization which required an API change for the IPushService. If
> you
> > plan to use it, do not forget to do an svn update.
> >
> > Xavier
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> Xavier Hanin wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 10/22/07, Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> today I wondered if there's a wicket-approach for pushing messages
> >> from
> >> >> the
> >> >> server to the client (also called reverse ajax or pushlets). Well
> yes,
> >> >> there
> >> >> is one called wicketstuff push. I looked at its examples and soon
> >> managed
> >> >> to
> >> >> implement my own pushing stuff. In the examples (chat-example)
> >> however,
> >> >> the
> >> >> ChannelService that delivers the messages to its listeners, is
> stored
> >> in
> >> >> the
> >> >> application. I.e. there is only one channel for the whole
> application.
> >> >> Now imagine I want to create an additional private-chat-room for two
> >> >> users
> >> >> --> I'd need a ChannelService only for two users. So my question is:
> >> >> what's
> >> >> the wicket way to pass and store such an object which is applicable
> >> only
> >> >> for
> >> >> two users (sessions)?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You can use an application wide ChannelService and use the channel
> name
> >> > ("chat/message" in the example) to isolate messages by
> >> private-chat-room.
> >> >
> >> > Xavier
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-and-sharing-an-IChannelService-tf4671463.html#a13345278
> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> >> > http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> >> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> >> > http://www.xoocode.org/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-and-sharing-an-IChannelService-tf4671463.html#a13358479
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> > http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> > http://www.xoocode.org/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-and-sharing-an-IChannelService-tf4671463.html#a13381208
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

Reply via email to