this cannot be an option. it always has to be enabled. if i write a component that uses this and someone drops it into application where this is disabled what should happen?
-igor On Nov 7, 2007 1:05 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 7, 2007 11:19 AM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can see how <wicket:abstract> and <wicket:implements> tags could be > > a nice enhancement to the current <wicket:extend> and <wicket:child> > > tags. Do you have a working, or mostly working, patch? > > What I think we should do with this is make it an option. It would be > turned off by default, requiring users to an extra one or two lines of > configuration to turn this on (we've done this before), and let it > prove itself. Sounds to me like everyone would be happy. > > WDYT? > > Eelco > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
