On Nov 7, 2007 5:53 PM, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > heh, well....you can be against this, but i think if we take a vote > > right now most core-devs with binding votes will vote this down.... > > I still can't see the reason for the negativity of some of the > core-devs: this is an existing feature.
People just have different opinions. And the opinions tend to be strong around here. :-) > If the feature sucks so bad why did people have the inspiration to add > it in the first place in the beginning of wicket's life? You can blame me for that actually... back then only Juergen cursed as he was the one who was going to implement it :-) Anyway, that was pre 1.0. Almost three years ago which is about a life time in IT terms. > We're just proposing to enhance an existing feature - evolution not > revolution. I think that regardless who is right or wrong here, we should just do this as a separate project, with separate tags. The advantage for the people who like this is then that they can implement it however they feel it should be done, and won't need to have crazy long threads to decide on things. And the core team doesn't have to support something they don't fully agree with. If we do that, I think everyone should be happy, and we can close the case, right? Cheers, Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
