Evan Chooly wrote: > >> Do you know if theres any plans on making a maven2 archetype for qwicket? > > That's a definite feature i plan on adding as soon as I can. As a > noted maven hater, though, it'll take some time and libations to help > me swallow my pride. :) >
Good luck! Archetypes are really a pain, because of the template text strings in the source that keep them from compiling in place, so they're hard to code, test, and maintain. I just abandoned mine. People can almost as easily rename classes and packages after the fact, I've rationalized. Nathan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JPA-best-practices--tf4777536.html#a13708172 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
