As far as an idea, I would suggest painting a dropdown-looking box (and 
triangle) around the month/year...If you point me in the right direction, I can 
see what I can do about a patch, but no promises that I would be successful or 
quick.

-Clay

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:43 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DatePicker.enableMonthYearSelect

there is still the possibility to somehow alter the displayed date to make
it clearer that one can click on it.
ideas and _patches_ are more than welcome ;)

gerolf

On Jan 15, 2008 8:38 PM, Clay Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> **nods**
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:01 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DatePicker.enableMonthYearSelect
>
> yeah, not a very good ui choice by yahoo... :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 11:00 AM, Clay Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cool, thanks!  I didn't even notice that you could click the month...
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:54 PM
> > To: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: DatePicker.enableMonthYearSelect
> >
> > we removed our self-developed version of the month/year selection.
> > instead we are using the CalendarNavigator provided by yahoo.
> > just move your mouse over the date in the header and click it.
> >
> > regards,
> >   gerolf
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2008 5:45 PM, Clay Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Everyone,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I was using 1.3-beta4 and I had overridden the DatePicker to enable
> the
> > > month and year to be selected by returning true from
> > > DatePicker.enableMonthYearSelect, and it was pretty cool.  After
> > > upgrading to wicket-1.3 final last week, today I noticed that the
> > > component on my page is back to the default DatePicker (just
> left/right
> > > arrows for the month).  Is this a known regression in the DateTime
> with
> > > the 1.3 final release?  Was something changed? Or is it likely
> something
> > > in my code...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -Clay
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to