Hi Martijn,

thanks for the response.

Though your suggestion doesn't solve the problem of embedding a Link
within a Label. I need to be able to translate the text surrounding
the link and the text of the link itself. Depending on the language,
the position of the link varies. I can't embed a Link within a Label
and I can't wrap the Link with Labels, because then the position would
be fixed.

In other words: How would you implement the HaveToSigninFragment?

Thanks
Jörn

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use fragments for that instead to switch between the two. So you have
>  a UserRegistrationPanel that provides this functionality. On the panel
>  you create 2 fragments: one for just the label, another for the label
>  and link. Now you can do in onbeforerender:
>
>  if(loggedIn)
>  addOrReplace(new WelcomeFragment());
>  else addOrReplace(new HaveToSigninFragment());
>
>
>  Martijn
>
>
>
>  On 3/10/08, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  >  I'd need some help on getting the following to work properly:
>  >
>  >  If the user is logged in, display some text "Hello {name}". If he
>  >  isn't logged in, display a text "Please register or login" instead,
>  >  where "register" is a link to the register page. If he clicks that
>  >  link and submits the register form, go back to the former page - use
>  >  the register page as an intercept page.
>  >
>  >  To start with, I don't know how to embed a link inside the label only
>  >  if the user is logged in - how should I structure the markup for that?
>  >  A Label component discards its body, so just nesting the link doesn't
>  >  work.
>  >
>  >  The other problem is that redirectToInterceptPage does the redirect,
>  >  but if I submit the register form I get a MarkupException about a
>  >  missing component. It looks like the intercept mechanism redirects
>  >  back to the original page, but loads the wrong template, here the
>  >  register-page-template. I've got no idea how to get that to work, so
>  >  far I replaced the intercept with a normal setResponsePage, which is
>  >  far from optimal.
>  >
>  >  Thanks
>  >  Jörn Zaefferer
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>  Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
>  Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to