yes, since the converter interface now has

convertToObject(String value);
convertToString(Object value);

not just a single convertTo(Object object, Class type)

it makes it rather explicit that the converter is meant to convert
something to a string and back...no?

-igor


On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i thought we agreed converters were type converters...
>
>  Did we? :-)
>
>  Eelco
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to