DOH! Pitfall of keeping up with the dev and users lists on my phone - sometimes I miss something - I was thinking this discussion was on the dev list (should've scrolled up and double-checked).
Either way, that actually lends more probability to us being able to do a quick 1.4 and drop 1.3. What do the core developers think? Jeremy Thomerson -- sent from a wireless device -----Original Message----- From: "Johan Compagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: 3/16/08 6:34 PM Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation it was already on the user list On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been surprised that we have not had a single person say that they > still require 1.4. Although I was originally against dropping 1.3 if we > did a quick 1.4 (because I assumed there'd be many who still needed Java > 1.4), perhaps we should open this up on the users list and get a more > accurate feel for it. > > Judging only by the response on this list, we could release a 1.4 that was > 1.3 + generics and drop support for 1.3. But I imagine that there will > still be some that need Java 1.4. > > Jeremy Thomerson > -- sent from a wireless device > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Scott Swank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Sent: 3/16/08 4:45 PM > Subject: Re: Planning Wicket Next Generation > > +1 for Java 5 & Generics > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > its binding now... > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) for a quick x-m1 with only generics release > > > > > > Maurice > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Thijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 to java 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > atul singh wrote: > > > > java 5 now definitely > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, James Carman < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/16/08, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for moving to java 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for moving to Java 5 *quickly* :) > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > > > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional > > > > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Scott Swank > reformed mathematician > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------=_Part_13704_23495408.1205706851286-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
