Can't we implement 'something' using an interceptor chain? Extensions can register themselves in the Application#init() method. There might be a chain for the webrequest cycle, for example. Each part in the chain may add some behavior to the cycle then.
2008/4/11, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You are correct in saying this may cause problems. So it is up to the > developers of the extensions to provide workarounds for this. > For instance wasp and swarm also provide an interface you can > implement on top of the other application you must extend. And if i > recall correctly an application can be springified using a simple > annotation or 1 line of code added to your application (don't ask me > how, i just remember hearing or reading about it somewhere, maybe one > of the other devs knows). > > I know this is not always an ideal situation, for instance with the > interfaces you end up copy pasting a lot of code, So if you have a > better suggestion.... > > Maurice > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Martijn Lindhout > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't exactly where I saw it also, but James has a point. I like to > see > > the things also more pluggable. I don't know if Wicket needs to be > modified > > or if 'wicket-extenders' should take another approach, but I find > myself to > > many times having to extend the same thing (my Application class) from > two > > different supertypes, e.g. (and this is maybe not a correct example, > but > > there are more) when using Spring you must extends Spring application, > and > > when using wicket-auth-roles, you need to extend > > AuthenticatedWebApplication. Since Java doesn't support multiple > inheritance > > this is a problem. > > > > How should we fix this? > > > > 2008/4/11, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > Wasp requires a custom WebSession, not a custom WebRequest, to handle > > > some trivial authentication stuff. > > > > > > > > > Maurice > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:56 PM, James Carman > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've never really cared for this whole idea of requiring > subclassing > > > > to get your work done. Is there no way to make things more > pluggable? > > > > Perhaps use the decorator design pattern? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Martijn Lindhout > > > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If I remember well, Wasp/Swarm needs its own WebRequest > subclass? > > > > > > > > > > 2008/4/10, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Martijn Lindhout > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > My two questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. is this necessary / bad? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no, it just adds some extra capability to the request > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. what if I need different types of requests in my > > > application? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i doubt you will. what usecases do you have? usecases for > > > subclassing > > > > > > request/response are few and far in between. > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Martijn Lindhout > > > > > > > JointEffort IT Services > > > > > > > http://www.jointeffort.nl > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn Lindhout > > > > > JointEffort IT Services > > > > > http://www.jointeffort.nl > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Martijn Lindhout > > JointEffort IT Services > > http://www.jointeffort.nl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Martijn Lindhout JointEffort IT Services http://www.jointeffort.nl [EMAIL PROTECTED] +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29
