If I understood you correctly, the first page is bookmarkable, the second is a wicket URL, tied to the session. That'd be bad for SEO - search engines couldn't see page 2, or they would, but the URL is tied to their session, so even if a user visited that URL, they wouldn't get that page. This means that any content past page one is unreachable from a search engine. I had another thread going about a problem I was having with sessions, which turned up some interesting data. I have over 31,000 pages indexed by Google, they are visiting bookmarkable URLS that DO have jsessionid in them, but only two pages in their index have a jsessionid in them. They obviously handle jsessionid fine these days, or at least they are for me.
If you need all of your content to be indexed, you really need to concern yourself with making every page bookmarkable. Take a look at Korbinian's comments above - it looks like he is doing it well. Or have a look at my comments or my site http://www.texashuntfish.com. You should specifically look at http://www.texashuntfish.com/thf/app/forum - I am using DataTable's there, but every link (including sort, etc) is bookmarkable. So, you may go into a category and get an URL like http://www.texashuntfish.com/thf/app/forum/cat-53/Let-s-Talk-Texas-Outdoors-Classifieds-Buy-Sell-Tradeor http://www.texashuntfish.com/thf/app/forum/18395/Winchester-22-model-61-for-sell. The "cat-53" or the "/18395/" are the only things that matters. I have a strategy mounted on "/forum" that will take the first parameter and use it to decode what kind of page is being requested - a category page, or a specific post, etc. Everything after that first parameter is specifically for SEO. Putting good keywords in the URL like that, and putting the subject of every article / calendar event / news or forum thread is what shot us up in the rankings of multiple search engines. Migrating the app from what it was before somerandomscript.cfm?foo=123123&bar=12321 to this made a HUGE difference. It wasn't without work - Wicket is super easy if you don't have to worry about URLs - but they also make it easy to totally customize all of your URLs, too. Shoot back any questions you have. Hopefully I can share more information, or even some code later. Maybe Korbinian and I should put some information on the Wiki about pretty URLs and SEO. Jeremy On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, > > That's kinda the route I've already taken. On my site, www.startfound.com > , > if you click on any company to see more details it goes to a bookmarkable > page. Same with any tag. Maybe if I've already got that much, I > shouldn't > concern myself with the fact that page 2 of my list is not bookmarkable > but > reachable by google bot. Or maybe I should just add a noindex meta tag on > every page that's not page 1. > > It'd be kinda ridiculous to require login to see past page 1. That may be > good for SEO but it'll drive people away. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Jeremy Thomerson > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:00 PM > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > I've been building a community-driven hunting and fishing site in Texas > > for > > the past year and a half. Since I have converted it to Wicket from > > ColdFusion, our search engine rankings have gone WAY UP. That's right, > > we're on the first page for tons of searches. Search for "texas > hunting" > > - > > we're second under only the Texas Parks and Wildlife Association. > > > > How? With Wicket? Yes - it requires a little more work. What I do is > > that > > for any link that I want Google to be able to follow, I have a subclass > of > > Link specific to that. For instance, ViewThreadLink, which takes the ID > > for > > the link and a model (detachable) of the thread. Then I mount an > > IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy for each big category of things in my > > webapp. I've made several strategies that I use over and over, just > > giving > > them a different mount path and a different parameter to tell it what > kind > > of article, etc, that it will match to. This is made easier because > over > > 75% of the objects in our site are all similar enough that the extend > from > > a > > base class that provides the basic functionality for an article / thread > / > > etc that has a title, text, pictures, comments, the standard stuff. > > > > So, yes, it takes work. But that's okay - SEO always takes work. I > also > > have given a lot of care to use good page titles, good semantic HTML and > > stuff things into the URL that don't have anything to do with locating > the > > resource, but give the search engines a clue as to what the content is. > > > > Yes, some pages end up with a jsessionid - and I don't like it (example: > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen- > > US%3Aofficial&q=%22south+texas+management+buck%22&btnG=Search). > > But, most don't because almost all of my links are bookmarkable. When > the > > user clicks something that they can only do as a signed-in user, then it > > redirects them to the sign in page, they sign in, and are taken back to > > the > > page they were on. Then they can pick up, and I don't worry about > > bookmarkable URLs for anything that requires user-authentication > (wizards > > to > > post a new listing, story, admin links, etc). > > > > Jeremy Thomerson > > TexasHuntFish.com > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, at least I'm not missing anything. I understand the benefits it's > > > providing with its stateful framework. Developing a site with Wicket > is > > > easier than with any other framework I've used. But this > statefulness, > > > which makes websites so easy to develop, seems to be counter > productive > > to > > > SEO: > > > > > > GoogleBot will follow and index stateful links. Worst case scenario, > > > these > > > actually become visible to google users and when they click the link > it > > > takes them to an "invalid session" page. They think, "This site is > > > broken" > > > and move on to the next link of their search result. > > > > > > Another approach to solving this is to block all the stateful pages in > > my > > > robots.txt file. But how can I block these links in robots.txt since > > they > > > change per session? Is there any way to know what the url will > resolve > > to > > > when googlebot tries to visit my site so I can tell it to disallow: > > > /?wicket:interface=:10:1::: and ?wicket:interface=:0:1::: and ...? > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:45 PM > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Ok I did a little preliminary research on this. Right now > > > > PagingNavigator > > > > > uses PagingNavigationLink's to represent its page. This extends > > > Link. > > > > I'm > > > > > supposed to override PagingNavigator's newPagingNavigationLink() > > > method > > > > to > > > > > accomplish this (I think) but past that, this isn't very > > > > straightforward to > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > Do I need to create my own BookmarkablePagingNavigationLink? > When > > I > > > > do... > > > > > what next? I really don't know enough about > bookmarkablePageLinks > > to > > > > do > > > > > this. Right now, all the magic happens inside > > PagingNavigationLink. > > > > Won't > > > > > I have to move all that logic into the WebPage that I'm passing > > into > > > > > BookmarkablePagingNavigationLink? This seems like a lot of work. > > Am > > > I > > > > > missing something critical? > > > > > > > > no, you are not missing anything. you see, when you go stateless, > like > > > > what you want, then you have to recreate all the magic stuff that > > > > makes stateful links Just Work. Without state you are back to the > > > > servlet/mvc programming model: you have to encode the state that you > > > > want into the link, then on the trip back decode it, recreate > > > > something from it, and then apply that something onto the > components. > > > > This is the crapwork that wicket does for you usually. > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:40 PM > > > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > > > > > you subclass the pagenavigator and make it use bookmarkable > links > > > > > > also. it has factory methods for all the links it uses. > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Dan Kaplan > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I wasn't talking about the links that are on the list (I > > already > > > > make > > > > > > those > > > > > > > bookmarkable). I'm talking about the links that the > Navigator > > > > > > generates. > > > > > > > How do I make it so page 2 is bookmarkable? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:30 PM > > > > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > item.add(new link("foo") { onclick() }); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > > > > item.add(new bookmarkablepagelink("foo", page.class)); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Dan Kaplan > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > How? I asked how to do it before and nobody suggested > this > > as > > > a > > > > > > > > possibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:26 PM > > > > > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dataview can work in a stateless mode, just use > > bookmarkable > > > > links > > > > > > inside > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Dan Kaplan > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Regardless, at the very least this makes your site look > > > > "weird" > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > unprofessional when google puts a jsessionid on your > > url. > > > > There > > > > > > has > > > > > > > got > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > be some negative effect when google visits it the > second > > > > time and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > jsessionid has changed but it sees the same exact > > content. > > > > Worst > > > > > > > case, > > > > > > > > > it'll think you're trying to trick it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About those 404s, I'm finding that with the fix I > > provided > > > I > > > > > > don't get > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > 404, but the links refresh the page I'm already on. > IE: > > > If > > > > I'm > > > > > > on A, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > link to B is non-bookmarkable, clicking B refreshes A. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This issue is very disconcerting to me. It's one of > the > > > > reasons > > > > > > I > > > > > > > wish > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > DataView had an option to work in stateless mode. > Cause > > > if > > > > I ban > > > > > > > cookies > > > > > > > > > and Googlebot visits my home page (with a navigator on > > > it), > > > > it'll > > > > > > try > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > follow all these page links and from its perspective, > > they > > > > all > > > > > > lead > > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > the first page. So it's kinda a catch-22: Include the > > > > jsessionid > > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > urls and get bad SEO or remove the jsessionid and get > > bad > > > > SEO :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps the answer to my prayers is a combination of > the > > > > > > > noindex/nofollow > > > > > > > > > meta tag with a sitemap.xml. I'm thinking I can put a > > > > nofollow > > > > > > on the > > > > > > > > home > > > > > > > > > page (so googlebot doesn't try to follow the navigator > > > > links) and > > > > > > use > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > sitemap.xml to point out the individual pages I want > it > > to > > > > index. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matej: can you go into more detail about your hybrid > URL > > > > > > statement? > > > > > > > > Won't > > > > > > > > > google index, for example, /home and /home.1 if I use > > it? > > > > When > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > follows > > > > > > > > > the next page, won't the url become /home.1.2 or > > > something? > > > > That > > > > > > .2 > > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > page version: If google indexes that and tries to > visit > > it > > > > again, > > > > > > > won't > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > report about an invalid session? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:10 AM > > > > > > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, crawling non-bookmarkable pages is > > not > > > > very > > > > > > useful > > > > > > > > > anyway, since ?wicket:interface url will always get > page > > > > expired > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > you click on the result. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, preserving session makes lot of sense with > > hybrid > > > > url. > > > > > > Google > > > > > > > > > remembers the original url (without page instance) > while > > > > indexing > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > real page (after redirect). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think though that the crawler is quite advanced. I'm > > > would > > > > > > think it > > > > > > > > > supports cookies (at least JSESSIONID) as well as it > > > > evaluates > > > > > > some of > > > > > > > > > the javascript on page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matej > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > right. if you strip sessionid then all your > > > > nonbookmarkable > > > > > > urls > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > resolve to a 404. that will probably drop your rank > a > > > lot > > > > > > > faster.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Johan Compagner > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > the problem is that then you have to have all > > > stateless > > > > > > pages. > > > > > > > Else > > > > > > > > > google > > > > > > > > > > > can't crawl your website. > > > > > > > > > > > And if that is the case then you could be > > completely > > > > > > stateless > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > have a session (id) to worry about at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Zappaterrini, > > Larry > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When Google asks to not have special treatment > > for > > > > their > > > > > > bot, > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > referring to content more than anything. > > Regarding > > > > the > > > > > > session > > > > > > > id > > > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > > > > coded in the URL, see the Technical guidelines > > > > section of > > > > > > > > Google's > > > > > > > > > > > > Webmaster Guidelines - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#desi > > > > > > > > > > > > gn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It specifically recommends "allow(ing) search > > bots > > > > to > > > > > > crawl > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > sites > > > > > > > > > > > > without session IDs or arguments that track > > their > > > > path > > > > > > through > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > site." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Johan Compagner > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ] > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 7:35 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > isnt google always saying that you shouldn't > > alter > > > > > > behavior of > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > site > > > > > > > > > > > > depending of it is there bot or not? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also by doing what you have done users > with > > > > cookies > > > > > > > disabled > > > > > > > > > wont be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > able to use your site... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion session id is a problem. > Google > > > > index the > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > page > > > > > > > > > > > > again > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About the users without cookies we can do > like > > > > this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static class Unbuffered extends > > > WebResponse > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private static final > String[] > > > > botAgents > > > > > > = { > > > > > > > > > > > > "onetszukaj", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "googlebot", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "appie", "architext", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "jeeves", "bjaaland", > > > > "ferret", > > > > > > > > "gulliver", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "harvest", "htdig", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "linkwalker", > "lycos_", > > > > "moget", > > > > > > > > > > > > "muscatferret", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "myweb", "nomad", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "scooter", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "yahoo!\\sslurp\\schina", > > > > > > "slurp", > > > > > > > > > "weblayers", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "antibot", "bruinbot", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "digout4u", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "echo!", > "ia_archiver", > > > > > > "jennybot", > > > > > > > > > "mercator", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "netcraft", "msnbot", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "petersnews", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "unlost_web_crawler", > > > > "voila", > > > > > > > > "webbase", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "webcollage", "cfetch", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "zyborg", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "wisenutbot", > "robot", > > > > "crawl", > > > > > > > "spider" > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > so on... */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Unbuffered(final > > > > > > HttpServletResponse > > > > > > > res) > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > super(res); > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Override > > > > > > > > > > > > > public CharSequence encodeURL(final > > > > CharSequence > > > > > > url) > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > return isAgent() ? url : > > > > > > super.encodeURL(url); > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private static boolean > > isAgent() > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String agent = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ((WebRequest)RequestCycle.get().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest().ge > > > > > > > > > > > > tHeader("User-Agent"); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for(String bot : > > > botAgents) > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > (agent.toLowerCase().indexOf(bot) != > > > > > > > > > > > > -1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return > > > > true; > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't test this code but I do similar > thing > > > in > > > > my > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > application > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spring and it works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take care, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artur > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO- > > > > > > tp16464534p1646739 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6.html< > http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO- > > > > > > tp16464534p1646 > > > > > > > > > 7396.html> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list > > archive > > > at > > > > > > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ----- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users- > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this message is > > > > proprietary > > > > > > > and/or > > > > > > > > > > > > confidential. If you are not the > > > > > > > > > > > > intended recipient, please: (i) delete the > > message > > > > and > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > copies; > > > > > > > > > (ii) do > > > > > > > > > > > > not disclose, > > > > > > > > > > > > distribute or use the message in any manner; > and > > > > (iii) > > > > > > notify > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > sender > > > > > > > > > > > > immediately. In addition, > > > > > > > > > > > > please be aware that any message addressed to > > our > > > > domain > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > subject > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > archiving and review by > > > > > > > > > > > > persons other than the intended recipient. > Thank > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ----- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users- > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Resizable and reorderable grid components. > > > > > > > > > http://www.inmethod.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ----- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ----- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ----- > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ----- > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
