so why dont we store the integer in the model then? save an extra
memory slot, because if you make it Void then no one can set the
modelobject anyways.
-igor
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm i will make it <Void>
> because the LoopItem doesnt really have a model with an Integer in the
> model..
> it has an primitive int itself stored in it self.
>
> johan
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Stefan Simik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Great, it work without warnings now ;)
>>
>> Joham, could you please change the following class too ?
>>
>> file: Loop.java
>> line: 53
>> from: LoopItem extends WebMarkupContainer
>> to: LoopItem extends WebMarkupContainer<Integer>
>>
>> thx ;)
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> >
>> > i already did the commit just yet..
>> >
>> > i did make them all because i think people generally dont want to
>> > generify them anyway (use the model object)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Stefan Simik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> please, and will be these classes later generified ?
>> >> Or should I make a RFE, or can I help anyway-for example attach a patch
>> ?
>> >>
>> >> I love your work and Wicket, so I do my best, to make it better ;)
>> >>
>> >> Stefan Simik
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > yes thats the reason
>> >> >
>> >> > you are calling the method add with a generified component but that
>> >> > container itself is not generified
>> >> >
>> >> > i dont like this about generics expecially the onces like this:
>> >> >
>> >> > add(MarkupContainer<?> container)
>> >> >
>> >> > then suddenly a none generified component cant be added...
>> >> > thats really stupid <?> should mean anything.. including none generics
>> >> >
>> >> > johan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Stefan Simik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have one idea,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the reason of the warnigs is, that parent of AjaxPagingNavigator is
>> >> >> PagingNavigator,
>> >> >> which has parent Panel ---> that is not parameterized.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The same problem is with LoopItem, which extends the
>> >> >> WebMarkupContainer ---> that is not parameterized.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ? could this be the reason ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Stefan Simik wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Mhmm, it is meaningful ;) I will know in future, thx
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > One of the last occuring warning is, when working with
>> >> >> > MarkupContainer#add(...) or #addOrReplace(...) method.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Example: I have a simple AjaxPagingNavigator, to which I add a
>> >> simple
>> >> >> > ListView
>> >> >> >
>> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > ListView<Integer> menu = new ListView<Integer>("id", numbers){
>> >> >> > //....populate metods
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> > add(menu); //warning here
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The warning says:
>> >> >> > "Type safety: The method add(Component...) belongs to the raw type
>> >> >> > MarkupContainer.
>> >> >> > References to generic type MarkupContainer<T> should be
>> >> parameterized"
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I cannot find out, what's the warning reason, because ListView self
>> >> is
>> >> >> > parameterized.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Using-generics-with-some-non-generic-classes-in-Wicket-tp17208928p17212015.html
>> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Using-generics-with-some-non-generic-classes-in-Wicket-1.4M1-tp17208928p17216869.html
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Using-generics-with-some-non-generic-classes-in-Wicket-1.4M1-tp17208928p17233011.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
