since then the thread has evolved into whether or not we should use <?
extends Component> or <? extends Component<?>>

-igor


On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>
>> i do like generics. did i ever say otherwise? the problem here is that
>> if we scope something as Class<? extends Component> then even though
>> you ARE using generics in your code you will still get a warning
>> because we did not scope the class as Class<? extends Component<?>>.
>>
>> on the other hand if we do scope it as Class<? extends Component<?>>
>> then you can no longer pass a raw reference when calling the function.
>
> But that's exactly the point isn't it? If you're using generics then you
> shouldn't be using raw Components anymore...
>
>> so we are screwed if we do and we are screwed if we dont, i expected
>> generics to be better.
>
> Well they definitely could have been better (erasure is terrible if you ask
> me), but I don't see what's wrong in this case. It warns you if you should
> be using a parameterized type but you don't.
>
>>> And especially if you look at the vote result, I think the majority wants
>>> the generics...
>>
>> that vote was before we uncovered this issue. we voted on the idea of
>> generics, not on the implementation.
>
> That's true, but I wonder if this issue would change the vote much. I don't
> really understand why it's an issue, because you can use generified
> Components always: Component<Object> if you don't want to constrain the
> model object, and Component<Void> if you don't need a model.
>
> The question that started the thread was about StringResourceModel which was
> not yet generified, and in that case, the warning seems to me to be
> perfectly ok: it just says StringResourceModel should be generified. It's
> not a release yet, so that some users who use the current snapshot run into
> these kind of warnings which cannot be removed seems to be fine to me...
>
> Regards,
> Sebastiaan
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to