That won't work for me b'cos I am also passing constructor arguments to the response Page. So "new Page()" is actually "new Page(x,y)".
jwcarman wrote: > > You could use the bookmarkable version of setResponsePage(). That > just says what type of page to instantiate. > > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I am looking to unit test the following: >> >> form.add(new AjaxSubmitLink("submitLink"){ >> private static final long serialVersionUID = >> 3239568065916265026L; >> >> @Override >> protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, >> Form form){ >> setResponsePage(new ScheduleEvent(event, >> resources)); >> } >> >> Calling >> tester.clickLink("submitLink", true); >> >> instantiates the ScheduleEvent class. I want to avoid this as it forces >> me >> to mock appropriate parameters for ScheduleEvent. All I want to do is >> check >> that the rendered page is of type ScheduleEvent. ScheduleEvent class will >> have it's own unit tests where I want to address issues concerning it. >> Has >> anyone done this?? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/unit-testing-setRenderResponse%28new-Page%28%29%29-without-instantiation-of-Page-tp17405981p17405981.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/unit-testing-setRenderResponse%28new-Page%28%29%29-without-instantiation-of-Page-tp17405981p17406699.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]