You would be inside the constructor of a page (or component) when you instantiate the validator (presumably). That page (or component) could have a @SpringBean injected into it. Then, it can pass that injected reference into the constructor of the validator.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That doesn't work either... b/c the validator instance has already been > set... > > @SpringBean would work, but the Validator will need to manually invoke the > Injector in it's own constructor. > > Or you can use http://code.google.com/p/salve/ which is what we do. > > > > jwcarman wrote: >> >> I meant from some other class (a Component) that had the bean >> injected. That class could then pass its injected dependency into the >> validator's constructor. >> >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> not without manually injecting the validator or making validate an >>> inner/anon class so it can access component's fields. >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, James Carman >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> You can, however, pass in an object obtained via injection with the >>>> @SpringBean annotation. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Another difference, if you have to do a database roundtrip (which you >>>>> will >>>>> likely need to verify a password) then the code for the validator is a >>>>> bit >>>>> more complicated. You have to take into account the fact that this gets >>>>> serialized/deserialized as part of the page so you can't just pass a DB >>>>> connection or hibernate session in the constructor. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eelco Hillenius wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> But can you please explain, why wouldn't you use validator for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that's just personal preference. Validators are reusable, >>>>>> while putting a check in onSubmit isn't. Whether that matters depends >>>>>> on your project and the context you do the check in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eelco >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/How-reliable-Validators-are--tp17697642p17699825.html >>>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/How-reliable-Validators-are--tp17697642p17702421.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
