Given the following from the wicket security quickstart (1.3-
SNAPSHOT)...
add(new PasswordTextField("password").setOutputMarkupId(false));
glassfish generates the following message....
Couldn't resolve model type of
Model:classname=[org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel
$
AttachedCompoundPropertyModel
]:nestedModel
=
[Model:classname
=[org.apache.wicket.model.CompoundPropertyModel]:nestedModel=[username
= "regular"]] for [MarkupContainer [Component id = password, page =
com.vzbi.ncs.argfrp.webapp.FilterRequest.app.LoginPage, path =
0:signInPanel:signInForm:password.PasswordTextField, isVisible = true,
isVersioned = false]], please set the type yourself.
Not setting the model does not seem to create a problem, but it would
seem that the system would prefer that models be set where applicable.
Is that the case? I have to admit, I'm a little anal about clearing
all warnings in my apps.
What would an appropriate model be for the above PasswordTextField()?
Models seem to be the most poorly "exampled" Wicket feature, in that
examples of Models rarely tell one why they are needed and what role
they perform. It's generally, here's an example to make your code
work. Clearly, in most cases the model contains the data for the
markup. But what would that data be for a PasswordTextField()? One
isn't normally going to pre-fill a password field, correct?
Thanks,
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
