Hello, I am not understanding exactly what you mean with "branding". Dynamicaly configure the PageLink Target for a customer?
greetings jensiator wrote: > > Hi > Does anyone know if its possible to brand the target/response page for a > PageLink in wicket? > > I have a "core" jar with all the base classes. I then have a war project > that depends on the core jar (using Maven2 + Idea). There will be a war > for every customer. Im able to brand everything I want to brand except a > PageLink / Link target. > I know that I can brand the hole page that holds the link but I dont think > thats a good solution. I'v found to reasons for that: > 1. I add the PageLinks in the Page java class constuctor. And I can't > change the Page java class in the core lib(it will change for all the > other brands). Very dangerous to add it again in the branded > war(duplicated reference). > 2. Even if 1. worked I dont want to brand the hole page because I'll get a > lot of duplicate code. Might be big even if I use wicket: extend. > > I found to possible solutions. > 1. I have written a PageLink that takes a string resource key. Example: > "linkToOptionPage". The value/target in the PageLink is then read from a > property file. I then brand the property file instead.(a little bit like > struts/JSF navigation rules) > 2.I might be able to use dependecy injection in Spring and change the hole > TargetPage class to the specific customers targetpage. But is it worth the > overhead? > > Or is it possible that wicket have som built in support for this? I have > not found anything. Please comment my suggestions or inform me if there is > another way? > Jens Alenius > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Branding-a-PageLink-target-Page-tp18382006p18382951.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
