Hello, First I'd like to wish you the best with your application.
I am interested in finding out more about you project because I'd like to be part of it, if I can. I have extensive experience with Java, but I've been writing Wicket applications only for a couple of years. The other problem is I work for Oracle as a technical consultant so I travel a lot. Next week for instance I'm expected in Argentina. That means my working hours depend on the time zone and regular workload. Please share more details like when the project is planned to start, how many hours per day, etc. Thank you, Cristi Manole On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Wayne Pope < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ok following my last email I have some opportunities for the right people. > > I'm in the middle of creating a new start-up with funding already sorted. > We've got a great idea for an online application totally based on Wicket. > > I'm activity seeking 2 to 4 developers who would like to get involved in > this new startup. We're based in the South of France/Cannes area (though > I'm > personally from the UK) and ideally looking for people to join us here for > a > 6 month contract to start with. > > However I realise that many of you a) already have jobs b) happy living > where you are. > So with this in mind I'm looking at perhaps creating a distributed/remote > team to work on this. - think 37signals.com for those who are aware. > > We can pay a straight daily rate, or perhaps more motivating - to have > shares in the company and grow with it. It's a strong business case, and I > believe we have to right people onboard outside of development. > > I wanted to go with an Agile/XP approach to this - so lots of fun coding > and > constant working version. This however isn't going to work as well if it > ends up being a remote team so may have to adopt. Like I said previously - > we're looking to create the small team here on the Riviera *ideally*. > > So if this sounds interesting please do email me or reply to this, and we > can talk some more. > > > Thanks > > Wayne >
