Matej,

What are the implications of the decision to "base Wicket Ajax Next
Generation on YUI" in terms of choosing a Javascript library for future
Wicket based web front ends? 

We too were tending towards jQuery, mainly because 
+ code based on jQuery can be quite terse yet still easy to read and
elegant.
+ it doesn't require any great Javascript expertise (in particular, no
obvious cross-browser issues to worry about so far).
+ it's got a small footprint and seems to be fast enough, even using the
(really useful) CSS selectors.
+ there's  huge number and variety of jQuery plugins for those special
occasions.
+ there's a big developer community/interest with plenty of reference
material, blogs etc...
+ the lack of any licensing concerns.
+ it's really easy to use and it just works. 

Since you have no doubt carefully looked at the options and chosen YUI as
the most appropriate for Wicket 1.5 (or, shall we just call it Wicket 5),
and having seen the magic you have performed with your inmethod grids, I
imagine that most of the above can be said for YUI too, and then some.

So ... would it make more sense to start preferring YUI for use in new
Wicket applications or will it not make any real difference which Javascript
library is used by the application developer?

Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk 


Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I haven't announced yet publicly but for some time I was working on
> Ajax implementation for 1.5.
> The work is available in
> /repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket
> 
> I will put together a wiki page when I have some free time.
> 
> I have of course considered jquery. I gave it a proper look but I
> decided to go with YUI instead because I like it's approach more. Also
> some functionality that YUI provides in core (dom manipulations) is
> only available as plugin to Jquery. New Wicket Ajax the is based on
> YUI3 which provides new node module that allows method chaining and
> kinda feels like jquery.
> 
> Also personally I consider YUI source code much more readable than jquery
> 
> -Matej
> 
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Has jquery been considered for WANG, or am I coming into this
>> conversation late?
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Probably something for 1.5 (with WANG–Wicket Ajax Next
>>> Generation–being based on YUI)
>>>
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I've been hearing some rants on how merging resources can up the
>>>> performance, should wicket be able todo this? I mean merging several
>>>> css's
>>>> into one etc.. I know it wont work for dynamic css/js/images. But on
>>>> static
>>>> it could, even yslow recommends you merge your resources into one... 
>>>> Images
>>>> might be stretching it too far?
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://workingwithrails.com/railsplugin/5317-asset-packager
>>>> http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/11/29/getting-to-10-actiontastic-actionatr-gwt-and-automagic-rest/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Wicket for love
>>>>
>>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/%22WANG%E2%80%93Wicket-Ajax-Next-Generation%E2%80%93being-based-on-YUI%22-%28MD%29-tp19168620p19168620.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to