We can remove it again if we don't need it anymore. Eelco
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now there really isn't any practical reason for having > IClusterable at all. > > Even terracotta uses regular serialization to get pages over cluster. > > -Matej > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> if you have objects that would be kept in the session, you have to use >> Serializable. >> at the moment you use that you can choose for IClusterable so that when you >> use terracotta it will be clustered >> >> johan >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:14 PM, shetc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> I guess my real questions was: What objects in a Wicket application should >>> be >>> marked as clusterable? >>> (Or did you already answer that? :confused: ) >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/IClusterable----When-should-it-be-used--tp19163261p19169507.html >>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
