Ooops sorry, did not think there would be any reply after a few days... Implementing the varargs doesn't make this any nicer, I think. (Well, a little bit...) The current way does not seem very elegant to me, why would one want to pass an array of propertymodels as a 4th param if all the data could be passed using a single model in the 3rd param? It just does not look right in the line of how elegant the very same works when there are no MessageFormat features needed.
I will have a look at it when there's time... maybe I'll be able to post an actual suggestion for improvement then, otherweise I will understand why it is implemented as it currently is. ;-) Timo Rantalaiho wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, pixologe wrote: >> Short question: if my interpretation of the source code is correct, it is >> not possible to use StringResourceModel's MessageFormat features just >> with a >> single model (without passing a params array). >> >> If this is right: would it be a good idea to make it possible or is there >> a >> good reason that it is not, which I am not aware of? > > I think that the best choice is to fix that with varargs in > Wicket 1.4 or 1.5 (that use Java 5 that has varargs). The > dependency on the order will stay though. > > Best wishes, > Timo > > -- > Timo Rantalaiho > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/StringResourceModel%3A-use-MessageFormat-features-without-params-array--tp19177943p19391213.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
