include example markup using <wicket:remove></wicket:remove>

Martijn

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some very annoing designers is messing things up :)
>
> Here's the thing. I'm designing the wicket pages and a  common thing is to
> add a css attribute to a ListView.
> Something like listItem.add( AttributeModifier( "myClass" , ...... to make a
> row red, something bold etc.
>
> My problem is that if there a several css  designers ( non java ), then
> every now and then they deside to throw away the css class and are not aware
> of that it's needed in wicket to markup the list.
>
> They only see the html markup and the css in there and do a css clean not
> realizing that the css class is needed.
>
> Sometimes we're not in the same office so it's a little frustrating to
> always tell them. What is the proper way of doing this? How can I get rid of
> this gap between css designers and wicket designers?
>
> Sometimes I try to add css as a header contribution in the wicket page but
> then the designer wondering why their css don't work.
>
> Pointers?
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-markup-and-wicket-page-tp19542131p19542131.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to