it had way "cooloer" functions as far as generic arguments went :)
-igor On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > should i? > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> youve never coded WTL? >> >> -igor >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Who has a real live example of this function: >> > >> > >> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166ydocs/jsr166y/forkjoin/ParallelArrayWithMapping.html#withMapping(jsr166y.forkjoin.Ops.BinaryOp,%20jsr166y.forkjoin.ParallelArrayWithMapping)<http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166ydocs/jsr166y/forkjoin/ParallelArrayWithMapping.html#withMapping%28jsr166y.forkjoin.Ops.BinaryOp,%20jsr166y.forkjoin.ParallelArrayWithMapping%29> >> > >> > Its one of the most beautiful generic methods i have ever seen! >> > dont you think? >> > >> > johan >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
