[X] YES 2008/11/24 Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello everyone, > I would like to get your opinion on an idea regarding the Wicket Stuff > project(s). As you are familiar with, Wicket Stuff is where anyone can > create anything related to Wicket, small or large. One problem that new > users of Wicket (and us "old" users) come across is that there is a lot of > stuff in there, and not all of it is well maintained, and there aren't > specific releases of many of the projects. So, you have to build it > yourself and figure out which version matches which Wicket version, etc... > > What I would like to know is if everyone thinks it would be good to have a > subset of WS projects that are structured in a way that they are always in > sync with the Wicket versions. IOW, there would be two branches - 1.3.X and > 1.4 (trunk), just like Wicket has. There would be a parent module and all > of the modules that wanted to participate would be structured under it. > They would all release in sync with Wicket. For instance, when Wicket > releases 1.4-RC2, we would cut a release of this wicket-stuff-structured > (bad name) and all of the projects under it at 1.4-RC2. I haven't yet > figured out how interim releases would work (new features are added to a WS > project and it wants to cut a release between wicket releases) or if that > matters. > > This would not have to effect all WS projects - someone could continue to > add projects to WS just like they do today. This would simply create a > sub-tree of projects that are in the structured / scheduled release area. > For those that don't want to be part of that structure, they could continue > operating as they do today. > > So, here's the vote: > > [ ] - NO! We should leave Wicket Stuff like it is - a free-for-all with no > structure > [ ] - YES - I would like to see at least the most used Wicket Stuff projects > structured so that they mirror Wicket, and a release is produced for each > Wicket release. > [ ] - Maybe - I have a better idea (perfect!) > > Also - please add the following: > 1 - Would you be interested in helping to maintain such a thing. (If we had > two or three of the owners of the larger projects on board, I don't think it > would be too hard to keep the codebase of this in sync with Wicket core.) > 2 - What projects do you own (and by your vote we'll see if you want those > projects to be included in this restructuring). > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
